Present: Kevin Mulcahy (Chair), Linda Langschied (Recorder), Rebecca
Gardner, Mary Fetzer, Howard Dess, Trivini Kuchi, Stephanie Bartz,
Farideh Tehrani, Patricia Libutti, Karen Hartman, Jeris Cassel,
Penny Page, Jackie Mardikian, Sara Harrington, Karen Wenk, Lourdes
Vazquez, Connie Wu, Ron Jantz
For FY 2002/'03 the overall RULS collections budget rose by by 11.3% over the preceding year, to $7.8 mill., but this number is inflated by carryovers from the preceding year and one time funding inputs, and does not represent a steady state, sustainable budget figure. A major portion of this increase was allocated for monograph purchases via the NB approval plan, firm monograph orders in individual selector accounts and standing orders: this was deliberately done in recognition of the lag in monograph purchases in the arts & humanities and social science dicsiplines over the past few years, and which was especially painful in 2002 due to the purchasing freeze that was imposed early in the year. Expenditures from individual selector accounts both for current periodicals and periodical packages dropped by 7.6% reflecting the ongoing shift from print to electronic access via Central, and the concomitant reallocation of funds from the selector accounts to Central (Central's share of the overall RULS budget grew by 36.5% this year). Finally, availability of non-state funds for collections dropped by almost 15% as compared with last year, reflecting lower donations overall and reduced earnings on endowed investment accounts.
Next year's collections budget scenario looks very grim at present due to the fiscal crisis prevailing throughout the state of NJ as a whole.Bob Sewell has advised CDC to work on two contingency budget reduction plans that envision a worst case cut of as much as 27% and a smaller but still devastating cut of "only" 13% (we will not get firm budget numbers until later in the summer after the Legislature and Governor sign off on the overall state budget, which includes Rutgers). Expressing the 27% cut solely in terms of journal cancellations and reduction in monograph purchases, a budget reduction of this magnitude translates into a loss of approx. 10,300 mongraphs NOT purchased next year, and cancellation of some 2874 journals. These estimates are for purposes of illustration only, and do not reflect other alternatives such as cancellation of some major electronic packages such as Science Direct. This option is already a subject of negotiation with Elsevier. The fate of other electronic resources will be the subject of recommendations to be made by a working group comprised of the CDC Networked Resources Teams plus RGS. Finally, another working group consisting of RGS plus the NBCG Chairs of the Arts & Humanities and the Social Sciences subgroups will determine how the NB approval plan might be pared down to keep approval costs more in line with anticipated budget shortfall.
Thanks to NBCG Chairs & selectors. Challenges: Reappraising division of funds among humanities/social sciences/sciences.
L. Langschied 6/25